Blog
Even well-run GTM organizations eventually reach a point where the formula for growth that once worked for them no longer does. Changing technologies, saturating marketing channels, and shifting user preferences can all cause growth to slow, while cash burn remains high. The wrong response in this scenario is panic. The right response is diagnosis and discipline.
Throughout our GTM series, we have focused on strategy and tactics to build predictable, scalable growth. Here we address what happens when that engine needs recalibration. Rebalancing growth and profitability is not a failure of strategy. It is an inevitable moment in any scaling company. The outcome depends on how quickly you identify the constraint and how decisively you act.
Diagnose the Core Issue
The first step in diagnosing any go-to-market problem is to pause and determine whether you are facing a product problem or an execution problem. The solutions to each are fundamentally different.
To determine if you have a product problem, you need to figure out the answers to these key questions:
- Are there obvious gaps in the product offering?
- Has the company been out-innovated?
- Are conversion rates still acceptable?
- Is the company winning its fair share of deals?
Consistent innovation is required to remain competitive. Every company experiences ebbs and flows in product positioning as markets evolve. The critical task is determining whether current performance reflects normal variance or a deeper breakdown in product-market fit.
If conversion rates are strong and the product remains well-positioned, the company qualifies for the easier set of problems, fixing GTM execution.
If conversion rates have declined or product gaps are evident, the focus must shift to product innovation. This is the harder set of problems and requires rapid, focused execution to restore product-market fit before GTM optimization can be effective.
The Easier Set of Problems: GTM Execution
If product positioning remains strong, but growth has slowed, the issues you are facing are likely from execution and optimization shortcomings. These can be addressed quickly once identified. This category centers on two goals:
Goal #1: Revenue Enablement
Revenue enablement is about ensuring the go-to-market engine has the capacity and structure required to return to growth and do so efficiently and effectively.
Growing Revenue Efficiently
Does the company have enough ramped sales capacity to grow at least 20% at the current GRR?
Depending on how much growth has slowed, getting back to at least 20% growth should be the first critical objective of the organization. Software companies below 20% growth see heavily-discounted valuations, which is why using 20% as the growth target floor is so important.
To determine whether there is sufficient ramped sales capacity, multiply the number of reps by current quotas. As discussed previously, ~120% quota coverage is ideal in order to achieve plan.
If rep capacity is insufficient, reduce spending elsewhere and reallocate aggressively toward additional rep capacity to provide the right ingredients to support 20 percent growth. Move fast. Speed matters.
Are current AEs effective?
Quota capacity may be sufficient on paper, but if reps don’t attain quota, quota capacity is less relevant. If quota attainment is around 80%, but growth is slow, you likely have effective reps but not enough of them. Work on increasing capacity and hiring additional reps. Remember that new AEs take six to eight months to reach productivity. If growth is required in Q3, hiring needs to begin in Q4 of the prior year. Interim solutions may include allocating quota to team leads, SEs, or high-performing SDRs.
If quota attainment is meaningfully below 80%, there is likely a lead generation or lead conversion problem. Mapping both historical lead volume and conversion rates over time will help identify bottleneck(s) and should then lead to weekly activity management to remove lead constraint(s). Work on each bottleneck in tight cycles of execution (days and weeks) to unlock conversion rates and top of funnel lead gen. Speed is key.
Do reps generate efficient OTE return?
Software companies with strong gross margins require a 3x to 4x return on OTE. If returns are closer to 2x at full attainment or 1.5x to 2x at typical attainment, unit economics are broken.
If OTE return is too low, you likely need to increase quotas or shift to lower-cost rep profiles to rebalance productivity and compensation. Fix unit efficiency to enable system efficiency and attainment.
Reducing Churn
Retaining customers is generally less expensive and intensive than winning new ones. Gross revenue retention below 90% is a red flag and a meaningful barrier to growth. Analyze churn by cohort and segment to identify patterns by customer profile, acquisition period, use case, or product module. Usage should inform renewal risk well before a customer’s renewal date.
Track weekly active users and customer ROI by account, identify declining engagement relative to baselines, trigger immediate outreach for at-risk accounts, and deploy a “save” playbook that includes executive engagement and targeted enablement. A customer retained today is more valuable than a new logo acquired tomorrow.
Increasing Net Expansion
Just as retaining customers is easier than landing new ones, increasing revenue from existing customers is typically more efficient than landing new ones. To increase revenue from existing customers, identify module adoption gaps and clear expansion opportunities within your existing customer base. Ensure teams are trained on expansion playbooks with incentives aligned to expansion outcomes. If expansion pathways do not exist, product strategy must change. If needed, modularize the product.
Net revenue retention should exceed 100%, with 120% as the target. Without expansion, churn must be replaced through increasingly expensive new logo acquisition. Fast paths to increase net expansion often include packaging existing features into new modules, introducing usage-based tiers, or increasing pricing.
Goal #2: Cash Flow Breakeven Through Cost Reduction and Revenue Growth
If the business needs to get to cash flow breakeven, cost structure must be addressed directly. Start by evaluating whether the organization is resourced appropriately for its current stage and growth profile.
Step 1: Identify all non-quota carrying roles
Identify all roles that are not directly selling or driving renewals/upsells in the organization. These roles may be valuable, but they must be justified when the company is in this situation.
Step 2: Benchmark and realign quickly
Evaluate whether each role is truly necessary and eliminate those that are not. There should be no sacred cows. Leverage widely available benchmarking data on average team sizes for software companies at a similar scale and adjust the organization quickly to achieve the right balance of scale, growth, and cash flow. Be cautious not to cut revenue-driving personnel or spend. Your priority should be to reduce expenses only as needed to achieve a sufficient cash runway/cash burn profile while being poised for 20%+ revenue growth.
The Harder Set of Problems
If product positioning has materially degraded, ask these questions:
- How has the customer problem set changed in the last 18 months?
- Tip: Do not rely on anecdotes. Talk directly to churned customers and those who chose competitors. Conduct structured interviews and analyze support data, feature requests, and competitive intelligence to understand how the customer problem set has evolved.
- Where is the product missing the mark vis-à-vis the customer problem set?
- Tip: Synthesize input from sales, customer success, and product. GTM optimization will not overcome degraded product positioning; identify the specific product problem with real data.
- How quickly can the product pipeline be adjusted and features introduced to achieve product-market fit again?
- Tip: Time is the primary constraint. If meaningful change can ship in 90 days, recovery is manageable. A 12 -18 month timeline may require a more fundamental pivot. Account for development velocity, enablement, and adoption when assessing feasibility.
- Tip: Look for quick wins through packaging, positioning, integrations, or vertical solutions that can be delivered faster than core product changes.
- What communication plan is required in conjunction with feature or module releases to ensure the market understands the product changes introduced and the company’s renewed ability to solve the evolved problem set?
- What communication plan is required for renewals, new logos, and existing customers to enable company champions?
Execute With Discipline
Once the plan is set, execution must be relentless. Increase cadence and meet twice weekly to review activity levels, conversion trends, capacity ramp, product delivery, customer engagement, and cash burn. Identify blockers immediately and assign ownership. Ensure GTM teams are fully enabled and close the gap between product delivery and GTM execution. Work backward from revenue targets to pipeline, lead volume, and activity metrics. If the math fails, adjust capacity or targets immediately. Delivery builds momentum. Momentum builds confidence.
Rebalancing a GTM engine is not about perfection. It is about clarity and speed. When growth and profitability fall out of balance, identify the constraint, make decisive changes, and execute with discipline. Teams with strong activity management, disciplined hiring, and operational rigor recover faster. Teams without them lose time they cannot afford. The goal is not just to survive rebalancing but rather to emerge with a GTM engine that is more predictable, more efficient, and more durable. When that happens, the next phase of growth can be truly sustainable.
Download Article
